Walsh v. Celestial Software, Inc. et al
| Secretary of Labor Martin J Walsh and United States Department of Labor |
| Lunar Logic 401(K) Plan, Celestial Software, Inc, CELESTE BURNS EDMAN, Todd Edman, Celestial Software, Inc. and Celeste Edman |
| 6:2021cv00797 |
| May 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael J McShane |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1104 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CONSENT JUDGMENT:. Signed on 6/15/2021 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed Motion . Filed by United States Department of Labor. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order Consent Judgment) (Falk, Joshua) |
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael J. McShane and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 9/22/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/22/2021. Pretrial Order is due by 10/22/2021. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (jw)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. (fee exempt status selected (AUSA)) Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Martin J Walsh against Celestial Software, Inc., et al. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Falk, Joshua) Modified on 5/25/2021 to correct name of defendant. (jw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
