Amador v. Toezpecunia, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Chantelle Amador
Defendant: Toezpecunia, Inc. an Oregon Corporation doing business as Sweet Illusions, Wayne M. Vajgert and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 6:2021cv01242
Filed: August 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Ann L Aiken
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 203
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Wayne M. Vajgert. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd)
August 20, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to Toezpecunia, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd)
August 20, 2021 Filing 4 Amended Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Amended Summons) Filed by Chantelle Amador. (Marshall, S.)
August 20, 2021 Filing 3 Amended Proposed Summons (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Amended Summons) Filed by Chantelle Amador. (Marshall, S.)
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/20/2021. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/18/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 1/18/2022. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (bd)
August 20, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8201988 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Chantelle Amador against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons). (Marshall, S.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amador v. Toezpecunia, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chantelle Amador
Represented By: S. Amanda Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toezpecunia, Inc. an Oregon Corporation doing business as Sweet Illusions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wayne M. Vajgert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?