Watkins v. Kayhill et al
| Donavan Watkins |
| Kayhill, Dr. C. DiGuilio, J. Poelz, State of Oregon and Oregon Department of Corrections |
| 6:2021cv01695 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Michael H Simon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed Filed by C. DiGuilio, State of Oregon, J. Poelz, Oregon Department of Corrections. (Hallman, Dylan) |
Filing 11
ORDER - Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Waiver of Service (ECF #9 ) is GRANTED. Waiver of service is due by January 26, 2022. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/13/2022.) (mja)
|
| Filing 10 Declaration of Dylan Hallman In Support of Motion for Extension of Time to File Waiver. Filed by Oregon Department of Corrections, State of Oregon. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time #9 .) (Hallman, Dylan) |
| Filing 9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Waiver. Filed by Oregon Department of Corrections, State of Oregon. (Hallman, Dylan) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver of Service is due by 1/12/2022.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/14/2021.)(Emailed notice and complaint to ODOJ.) (dsg) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO COLLECT INMATEFILING FEE: Plaintiff's provisional in forma pauperis status is CONFIRMED. IT IS ORDERED that the prison trust account coordinator for the Nevada Department of Corrections or designee shall collect from Plaintiff's trust account an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $116.49 and shall forward the amount to the Clerk of Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that thereafter, the trust account coordinator or designee shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the balance of the filing fee and shall forward payments to the Clerk of Court. Signed on 12/13/2021 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party and Nevada Department of Corrections on 12/14/2021.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 11/23/2021.) (dsg) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Nevada; Case Number 3:21-cv-00447. Electronic file received. |
|
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER - Clerk of the Court will transfer this case to the United States District Court for Oregon, Eugene Division. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court close the case in this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/22/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) [Transferred from Nevada on 11/23/2021.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE/FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE re ECF No. #1 IFP application, by Plaintiff Donavan Watkins (DRM) [Transferred from Nevada on 11/23/2021.] |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) [Transferred from Nevada on 11/23/2021.] |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) [Transferred from Nevada on 11/23/2021.] |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Donavan Watkins. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (DRM) [Transferred from Nevada on 11/23/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
