Miller v. City of Eugene et al
| Rickie A. Miller |
| City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Det. Anne McIntyre and Chief Chris Skinner |
| 6:2021cv01803 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing Fee in amount of $402.00 collected; Receipt No. 96632 issued. (fp)
|
|
Filing 5
Motion for Extension of Time. Filed by Rickie A. Miller. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff'sapplication to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is DENIED. Should Plaintiff wish to continue with this case, he must pay the $402.00 civil filing fee within 30 days. Plaintiff is advised that his failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed on 1/4/2022 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/4/2022.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 3
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Rickie A. Miller. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael H. Simon. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/14/2021.) (joha)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint. (NO IFP Filed, NO Filing Fee Paid) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Rickie A. Miller against All Defendants. (joha)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
