Burnett v. Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
| Eugenia Burnett |
| Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon |
| 6:2022cv00044 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Defendant's answer is due 4/11/2022. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #7 is denied as MOOT. (jk)
|
| Filing 8 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon waiver sent on 2/10/2022. Filed by Eugenia Burnett. (Tapper, Clinton) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Filed by Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Marisseau, Medora) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon. Filed by Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon. (Marisseau, Medora) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of Medora A. Marisseau appearing on behalf of Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon. Filed by Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon. (Marisseau, Medora) |
|
Filing 4
Case Management Order signed on 1/11/2022 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 5/10/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/9/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 6/9/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (bd)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8365992 Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Eugenia Burnett against Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Tapper, Clinton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burnett v. Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugenia Burnett | |
| Represented By: | Clinton L. Tapper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon | |
| Represented By: | Medora A. Marisseau |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
