Henderson et al v. Full Access Brokerage FAB et al
| Patrick Louis Henderson, Christine Henderson, Angela M Peyton and Jason A Henderson |
| Full Access Brokerage, Lane County Developmental Disabilities, Oregon Developmental Disabilities Services and Oregon Health Authority |
| 6:2022cv00183 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael J McShane |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Clerk's Notice of Mailing to Patrick Louis Henderson, Christine Henderson, Angela M Peyton and Jason A Henderson regarding Order 12 . (bd) |
Filing 12
Order: Although Plaintiff submitted a copy of her driver's license for filing, the Court presumes Ms. Henderson does not want that document filed and declined to docket it at this time. If the Court is incorrect and Ms. Henderson wants her license filed, she may resend the photocopy and the Court will add it to the docket. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
|
| Filing 11 Amended Complaint. Filed by Christine Henderson against Full Access Brokerage, Lane County Developmental Disabilities, Oregon Developmental Disabilities Services, Oregon Health Authority. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons (incomplete).) (bd) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Order on motion/application for leave to proceed ifp, Order on motion for reconsideration 8 sent to Jason A. Henderson on 03/14/2022 returned as undeliverable. (bd) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration #7 and motion to proceed in forma pauperis #6 . In addition to the reasons stated in the Judgment dismissing this action, there is no indication that Plaintiff is an attorney. Therefore, she may not advance claims on behalf of others and may not proceed pro se in an alleged qui tam action. Simon v. Hartford Life Ins., 546 F.3d 661, 664-65 (9th Cir. 2008). Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/14/2022.) (cp)
|
| Filing 9 Notice. Filed by Christine Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment.) (bd) |
| Filing 7 Motion for Reconsideration of Judgment #3 . Filed by Christine Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment.) (bd) |
| Filing 6 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Christine Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment.) (bd) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Judgment #3 sent to Jason A. Henderson returned as undeliverable. (bd) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned - Undeliverable: Case Assignment Notice #2 sent to Jason A. Henderson on 02/04/2022 returned as undeliverable. (bd) |
| Filing 3 JUDGMENT: As Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee, failed to apply for in forma pauperis, and fails to state a claim, this action is DISMISSED. Additionally, the Court finds this Complaint is duplicative of numerous other pending actions filed by Plaintiff Henderson. Signed on 2/9/2022 by Judge Michael J. McShane.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/9/2022.) (cp) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se parties on 02/04/2022.) (bd) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. (No filing fee paid, no IFP filed.) Filed by Christine Henderson against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet #1 (unsigned), #2 Civil Cover Sheet #2 (unsigned), #3 Civil Cover Sheet #3 (unsigned), #4 Civil Cover Sheet $4 (unsigned).) (bd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
