Woodward v. Marion County Jail Medical Staff
| Christopher Robert Woodward |
| Marion County Jail Medical Staff |
| 6:2022cv00284 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael W Mosman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. This Court certifies that any appeal from this Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed on 3/29/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/29/2022.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO DISMISS: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint #2 is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Additionally, for the reasons set forth above, this Court certifies that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed on 3/29/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/29/2022.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL: Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 is DENIED. Signed on 3/29/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/29/2022.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO COLLECT FILING FEE: Plaintiff's provisional in forma pauperis status is CONFIRMED. IT IS ORDERED that the Marion County Sheriff or the Sheriffs designee shall collect payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account and shall forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court. Signed on 3/29/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/29/2022.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 02/23/2022.) (bd) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. Filed by Christopher Robert Woodward. (bd) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. (In Forma Pauperis Pending.) Filed by Christopher Robert Woodward against Marion County Jail Medical Staff. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet.) (bd) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Christopher Robert Woodward. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Trust Account Statement.) (bd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodward v. Marion County Jail Medical Staff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Robert Woodward | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Marion County Jail Medical Staff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
