Woodward v. Marion County Jail Medical Staff
Plaintiff: Christopher Robert Woodward
Defendant: Marion County Jail Medical Staff
Case Number: 6:2022cv00284
Filed: February 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael W Mosman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. This Court certifies that any appeal from this Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed on 3/29/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/29/2022.) (dsg)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO DISMISS: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint #2 is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Additionally, for the reasons set forth above, this Court certifies that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed on 3/29/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/29/2022.) (dsg)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL: Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 is DENIED. Signed on 3/29/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/29/2022.) (dsg)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO COLLECT FILING FEE: Plaintiff's provisional in forma pauperis status is CONFIRMED. IT IS ORDERED that the Marion County Sheriff or the Sheriffs designee shall collect payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account and shall forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court. Signed on 3/29/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/29/2022.) (dsg)
March 7, 2022 Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg)
February 23, 2022 Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 02/23/2022.) (bd)
February 22, 2022 Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. Filed by Christopher Robert Woodward. (bd)
February 22, 2022 Filing 2 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. (In Forma Pauperis Pending.) Filed by Christopher Robert Woodward against Marion County Jail Medical Staff. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet.) (bd)
February 22, 2022 Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Christopher Robert Woodward. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Trust Account Statement.) (bd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodward v. Marion County Jail Medical Staff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Robert Woodward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marion County Jail Medical Staff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?