Doe v. Congregation of the Priests of the Sacred Heart, Inc. et al
| John Doe |
| Congregation of the Priests of the Sacred Heart, Inc., Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Roman Catholic Archbishop Of Portland In Oregon and successors, a corporation sole doing business as Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Bryan Benoit and Priests of the Sacred Heart |
| 6:2022cv00309 |
| February 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 First Amended Complaint . Filed by John Doe against All Defendants. (Curtis, Kirsten) |
Filing 20
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint by Interlineation for Substitution of Party #16 is denied as MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint #17 is GRANTED. Amended Complaint is due 4/26/2022. (jk)
|
| Filing 19 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #17 . A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The incorrect event was used. The following corrections were made to the record: The incorrect event was selected at filing [Notice]. The event has been changed [to Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint] and docket text has been corrected. The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties. (jw) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #16 . A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The incorrect event was used. The following corrections were made to the record: The incorrect event was selected at filing [Request]. The event has been changed [to Motion to Amend] and docket text has been corrected. The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties. (jw) |
| Filing 17 Motion to Amend Complaint by Interlineation for Substitution of Party Filed by John Doe. (Related document(s): Request #16 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Curtis, Kirsten) Modified on 3/28/2022 to change event type from Notice to Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Notice of Electronic Filing regenerated to the parties. (jw) |
| Filing 16 Motion to Amend Complaint by Interlineation for Substitution of Party. Filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Curtis, Kirsten) Modified on 3/28/2022 to change event from Request to Motion to Amend. Notice of Electronic Filing regenerated to the parties. (jw) |
| Filing 15 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon waiver sent on 3/10/2022; Roman Catholic Archbishop Of Portland In Oregon waiver sent on 3/10/2022. Filed by Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon; Roman Catholic Archbishop Of Portland In Oregon. (Helton, Anna) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance of Anna M. Helton appearing on behalf of Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Roman Catholic Archbishop Of Portland In Oregon. Filed by Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Roman Catholic Archbishop Of Portland In Oregon. (Helton, Anna) |
| Filing 13 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by Bryan Benoit waiver sent on 3/4/2022. Filed by John Doe. (Curtis, Kirsten) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued Electronically as to Bryan Benoit. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jw) |
| Filing 11 Amended Proposed Summons Bryan Benoit Filed by John Doe. (Curtis, Kirsten) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued Electronically as to Congregation of the Priests of the Sacred Heart, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jw) |
| Filing 9 Amended Proposed Summons Congregation of the Priests of the Sacred Heart, Inc Filed by John Doe. (Curtis, Kirsten) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued Electronically as to Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Roman Catholic Archbishop Of Portland In Oregon. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (Attachments: #1 Summons Roman Catholic Archbishop) (jw) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon Filed by John Doe. (Curtis, Kirsten) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons The Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon Filed by John Doe. (Curtis, Kirsten) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons Congregation of the Priests of the Scared Heart, Inc. Filed by John Doe. (Curtis, Kirsten) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons Bryan Benoit Filed by John Doe. (Curtis, Kirsten) |
|
Filing 3
Case Management Order signed on 3/1/2022 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 6/27/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 7/25/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 7/25/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jw)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8423069 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by John Doe against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Curtis, Kirsten) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
