Bennett v. Roseburg Parole & Probation Office
| Stephen Bennett |
| Roseburg Parole & Probation Office |
| 6:2022cv00522 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Order, this case is DISMISSED. Signed on 6/7/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/7/2022.) (ck)
|
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and the time for doing so has passed. This case is therefore DISMISSED and final judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed on 6/7/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/7/2022.) (ck)
|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's request for a TRO is DENIED and the Complaint #1 is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days in which to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in entry of a judgment of dismissal without further notice. Plaintiff's IFP application #2 is DENIED with leave to refile using the Court-provided form. The Court will mail a copy of the form to Plaintiff, along with a copy of this Order. Signed on 4/7/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (This Order and an IFP application deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/7/2022.) (ck)
|
Filing 5
Case Management Order signed on 4/6/2022 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/6/2022.) (jk)
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Complaint (titled "Original Complaint (to be updated)") and Emergency Injunction Requested #1 is referred to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/6/2022.) (jk)
|
Filing 3
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 04/06/2022.) (bd)
|
Filing 2
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP (titled "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis"). Filed by Stephen Bennett. (bd)
|
Filing 1
Complaint (titled "Original Complaint (to be updated)") and Emergency Injunction Requested. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Stephen Bennett against Roseburg Parole & Probation Office. (Attachments: #1 Attachment "Original Complaint Continued in Handwriting," #2 Attachment "Emergency Injunction Requested State of Extradition Order that Will be Executed on April 8th.") (No Civil Cover Sheet Included.) (bd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bennett v. Roseburg Parole & Probation Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephen Bennett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Roseburg Parole & Probation Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.