Old Hazeldell Quarry, LLC v. Lane County
| Old Hazeldell Quarry, LLC |
| Lane County |
| 6:2022cv00706 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Real Property: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #7 . Answer is due by 7/29/2022. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by Lane County. (Dingle, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Correction by Clerk regarding #5 Affidavit of Service. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The document was missing a case caption cover page. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment.The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties. (cw) |
| Filing 5 Affidavit of Service of Summons Issued #3 upon Lane County served on 5/16/2022 Filed by Old Hazeldell Quarry, LLC. (Larkin, Thomas) (Main Document 5 replaced on 5/17/2022) (cw). |
|
Filing 4
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 5/16/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Lane County. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jw) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 9/12/2022. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 10/11/2022. Pretrial Order is due by 10/11/2022. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (jw)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8517164 (In forma pauperis status selected) Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Old Hazeldell Quarry, LLC against Lane County. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Proposed Summons). (Larkin, Thomas) Modified on 5/13/2022 to strike IFP status, enter payment information, correct all caps, and correct defendant name. Notice of Electronic Filing regenerated. (jw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Old Hazeldell Quarry, LLC v. Lane County | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Old Hazeldell Quarry, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Thomas A. Larkin |
| Represented By: | Grant N. Margeson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lane County | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Edward Dingle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
