Salinas v. Highberger
| Eliseo Lee Salinas |
| Joshua Highberger |
| 6:2022cv00839 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Youlee Yim You |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 10
Notice of Attorney Substitution: Nick M Kallstrom is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Kristen E. Boyd . Filed by Joshua Highberger. (Kallstrom, Nick)
|
|
Filing 9
Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Scheduling Order upon the State Attorney General on behalf of Joshua Highberger. Filed by Joshua Highberger. (Boyd, Kristen)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Petitioner having paid the filing fee, the Court FINDS MOOT Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/22/2022.) (ps1)
|
|
Filing 7
Habeas Corpus Scheduling Order Serving Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2254 #2 on respondent. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #4 ) is DENIED without prejudice to his right to refile the Motion after Respondent has filed an answer or other responsive pleading. Answer is due by 8/22/2022. Signed on 6/22/2022 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance and Acknowledgment, #2 Petition) (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/22/2022.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected; Receipt No. 98508 issued. (fp) Modified on 6/22/2022 to change file date and remove the word "Partial" from the docket text. (fp).
|
|
Filing 6
Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/9/2022.) (dsg)
|
|
Filing 4
Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Eliseo Lee Salinas. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 3
Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 2
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State). In forma pauperis pending. Filed by Eliseo Lee Salinas against Joshua Highberger. (dsg)
|
|
Filing 1
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Eliseo Lee Salinas. (dsg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Salinas v. Highberger | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eliseo Lee Salinas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Joshua Highberger | |
| Represented By: | Nick M Kallstrom |
| Represented By: | Kristen E. Boyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
