Douglas v. Young et al
| Dameion Douglas |
| Stuart Young, Daryl Borello, Chaplain Thompson, Chaplain Stalhnecker, Stewart and Sergeant Whitney |
| 6:2022cv01004 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 First Amended Complaint. Filed by Dameion Douglas against Daryl Borello, Stalhnecker, Stewart, Thompson, Whitney, Stuart Young. (dsg) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Within 30 days after receipt of this Order, plaintiff shall submit the $402 filing fee or a completed IFP application. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed on 08/25/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party with form Application for Leave to Proceed IFP on 08/25/2022.) (bd)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/12/2022.) (dsg) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. NO FEE, NO IFP. Filed by Dameion Douglas against Daryl Borello, Stalhnecker, Stewart, Thompson, Whitney, Stuart Young (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (dsg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
