Beadle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Andrea C. Beadle
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 6:2022cv01286
Filed: August 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Ann L Aiken
Referring Judge: Stacie F Beckerman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 9/2/2022, answer due on 1/3/2023. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Reese, Sherwood)
September 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice of Appearance of Katherine B. Watson appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Watson, Katherine)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jw)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ). Signed on 8/30/2022 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Ann L. Aiken to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (cw)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (jw)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Andrea C. Beadle. (Reese, Sherwood)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Andrea C. Beadle against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Reese, Sherwood)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beadle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea C. Beadle
Represented By: Luke Moen-Johnson
Represented By: Sherwood J. Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Katherine B. Watson
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?