Carrasco Castaneda v. Larson et al
| Jaime Carrasco Castaneda |
| Tad Larson, Marion County Corrections, Deputy Ramsey, Dep. Sgt. Jochums and Sgt. Reidburger |
| 6:2022cv01430 |
| September 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mark D Clarke |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: The Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Case and Waive Fees #10 , and DISMISSES this action, without prejudice. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's request to waive the filing fee and DENIES AS MOOT any pending motions. Signed on 10/21/2022 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/21/2022.) (dsg)
|
| Filing 10 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal and Relief from Fees. Filed by Jaime Carrasco Castaneda. ( #1 Attachment) (kgc) |
| Filing 9 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (sb) |
|
Filing 8
Order for Administrative Correction of the Record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) regarding #7 Order on Motion for Appointment of Counsel. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: The incorrect case number was listed on the PDF. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded and has replaced the incorrect attachment.The Notice of Electronic Filing will be regenerated to all parties.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/6/2022.) (cw)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO AMEND: Within thirty days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that if he does not file an amended complaint within thirty days, this action will be dismissed. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Plaintiff may renew his request for counsel at a later stage of the proceeding #3 . Signed on 10/4/2022 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/4/2022.) (jkm) (Main Document 7 replaced on 10/5/2022) (cw).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 . Sheriff Joe Kast (Kast) shall collect from Plaintiffs trust account an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $10.90 and forward the funds to the Clerk of Court. Kast shall collect the balance of the filing fee and forward the funds to the Clerk of Court, in accordance with the formula set forth above, until a total of $350.00 has been collected and forwarded to the Court. Court directs the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this Order to Sheriff Joe Kast. Signed on 10/4/2022 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/4/2022 and Sheriff Joe Kast.) (jkm)
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jaime Carrasco Castaneda. Filed by Jaime Carrasco Castaneda. (dsg) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 9/22/22.) (sb) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Filed by Jaime Carrasco Castaneda. (sb) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. (IFP Submitted) Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Jaime Carrasco Castaneda against Dep. Sgt. Jochums, Deputy Ramsey, Tad Larson, Marion County Corrections, Sgt. Reidburger. (sb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
