Nollen v. Pacific Cast Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tabatha Nollen
Defendant: Pacific Cast Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2023cv00112
Filed: January 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael J McShane
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12201 Americans With Disabilities Act-Injured Worker Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2023 Filing 9 MINUTES of Proceedings: Rule 16 Conference held. Discovery is to be completed by 8/16/2023. Dispositive Motions are due by 9/30/2023. Alan J. Leiman present as counsel for plaintiff. Mark A. Crabtree present as counsel for defendant. Court Reporter: None Present. Judge Michael J. McShane presiding. (cp)
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Scheduling Order: Rule 16 Conference is set for 2/28/2023 at 09:15AM in Eugene by telephone before Judge Michael J. McShane. The Court will provide the parties with the conference call-in information by separate email. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
February 15, 2023 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by All Defendants. (Crabtree, Mark)
February 15, 2023 Filing 6 Answer to #1 Complaint, Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Pacific Cast Technologies, Inc.. (Crabtree, Mark)
February 2, 2023 Filing 5 Declaration/ Affidavit of Service of Summons Issued #4 upon Pacific Cast Technologies, Inc. served on 1/25/2023 Filed by Tabatha Nollen. (Leiman, Alan)
January 24, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Pacific Cast Technologies, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd)
January 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael J. McShane and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 5/24/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/23/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 6/23/2023. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (bd)
January 23, 2023 Filing 2 Proposed Summons Filed by Tabatha Nollen. (Leiman, Alan)
January 23, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-8794967 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Tabatha Nollen against Pacific Cast Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Leiman, Alan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nollen v. Pacific Cast Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tabatha Nollen
Represented By: Alan J. Leiman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Cast Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin M. Coles
Represented By: Mark A. Crabtree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?