Gardiner Jr. v. Barden et al
Plaintiff: Donald Harlin Gardiner Jr.
Defendant: Deputy Sheriff Daniel Barden, Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin, Douglas County District Attorneys Office and Grand Jury
Case Number: 6:2023cv00288
Filed: February 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Mustafa T Kasubhai
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2023 Filing 8 Motion to Dismiss . Filed by Douglas County District Attorneys Office. (Thompson, Eliot)
March 15, 2023 Filing 7 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge.
March 13, 2023 Filing 5 Waiver of Service of Summons Returned Executed by Douglas County District Attorneys Office waiver sent on 3/13/2023. Filed by Douglas County District Attorneys Office. (Thompson, Eliot)
March 10, 2023 Filing 6 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (jw)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case Management Order signed on 3/2/2023 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 3/2/2023.) (jk)
February 28, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/28/2023.) (jw)
February 28, 2023 Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Donald Harlin Gardiner Jr. (jw)
February 28, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Donald Harlin Gardiner Jr. against Deputy Sheriff Daniel Barden, Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin, Douglas County District Attorneys Office, Grand Jury. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D). (jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gardiner Jr. v. Barden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Harlin Gardiner Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Sheriff Daniel Barden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County District Attorneys Office
Represented By: Eliot Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grand Jury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?