Lane v. Fuhre
Petitioner: Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent: Cory Fuhre
Case Number: 6:2023cv00756
Filed: May 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Jeff Armistead
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is dismissed, without prejudice. Signed on 7/6/2023 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/7/2023.) (dsg)
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO DISMISS: Petitioner did not pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed on 7/6/2023 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/7/2023.) (dsg)
June 5, 2023 Filing 5 Notice. Filed by Gilbert Lewis Lane. (sb)
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order for Administrative Correction of the Record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) regarding #3 Scheduling Order. A Clerical error has been discovered in the case record: An incorrect PDF was attached to the entry. The following corrections were made to the record: A corrected PDF has been uploaded to replace the incorrect one. The Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) will be regenerated to all parties.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/31/2023.) (cw)
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Lowe must submit the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. The failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send Lowe a form application to proceed in forma pauperis with this order. Signed on 5/30/23 by Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (Copy of Order and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/30/23.) (sb) (Main Document 3 replaced on 5/31/2023) (cw).
May 22, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jeff Armistead. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/22/2023.) (dsg)
May 22, 2023 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State) (No IFP Filed, No Filing Fee Paid). Filed by Gilbert Lewis Lowe against Cory Fuhre. (dsg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lane v. Fuhre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gilbert Lewis Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gilbert Lewis Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cory Fuhre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?