Cooper v. Alvarez et al
| Jed Cooper |
| Ivan Alvarez, Cory Roberts, City of Portland and Multnomah County |
| 6:2023cv00821 |
| June 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Mustafa T Kasubhai |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER signed on 7/27/2023 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. However, the Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend to cure, if possible, the deficiencies outlined above. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. The Clerk of Court shall not issue process until further order of the Court. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/27/2023.) (jk)
|
| Filing 5 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (bd) |
|
Filing 4
Case Management Order signed on 6/8/2023 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/8/2023.) (jk)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 06/07/2023.) (bd) |
| Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Jed Cooper. (bd) |
| Filing 1 Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Jed Cooper against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet.) (bd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
