Smith Jr. v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
David Smith Jr. and David Smith, Jr. |
Oregon Department of Corrections, John and Jane Doe I-X and John and Jane Does |
6:2023cv01053 |
July 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mark D Clarke |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RECORD OF ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke: SETTING a telephonic Rule 16 Conference for 10/16/2023 at 10:00 AM. Conference call information will be provided in a separate entry. At the time of the Conference, parties should have their calendars available to discuss scheduling matters, including modification of the current case deadlines, joining additional parties and amending the pleadings, dispositive motions, and setting a trial date. The parties shall consult pursuant to FRCP 26(f) regarding a focused and proportional discovery plan prior to the Conference. A written report is not required. However, the parties should be prepared to briefly summarize the issues in the case and give the Court a realistic picture of what discovery needs to be completed. The ultimate goal of the discovery plan shall be "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of the action. FRCP 1. If depositions are anticipated, the parties should confer prior to the Conference and have a firm date for the depositions scheduled prior to the conference. Parties shall confer prior to the Conference and consider whether the case could benefit from a streamlined approach, utilizing limited discovery and early dispositive motions, settlement conference, or an expedited trial date. Finally, if the parties intend to file written consents (these need to be filed separately on the docket by each party and not combined in a Joint Status Report) to a magistrate judge, it would be helpful to do so prior to the Rule 16 Conference, particularly if they want to secure a firm trial date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) (rsm) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Finding as Moot Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #5 . Answer filed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm) |
Filing 7 Answer to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand . Filed by Oregon Department of Corrections. (Hallman, Dylan) |
Filing 6 Declaration of Dylan Hallman in support of Motion for Extension to Answer. Filed by Oregon Department of Corrections. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #5 .) (Hallman, Dylan) |
Filing 5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by Oregon Department of Corrections. (Hallman, Dylan) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed as to Oregon Department of Corrections served on 7/24/2023, answer due on 8/14/2023. (Burgess, John) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Oregon Department of Corrections. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (bd) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 11/16/2023. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 12/18/2023. Pretrial Order is due by 12/18/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (bd) |
Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9015706 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by David Smith Jr. against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Attorney Information; Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Def. Oregon Department of Corrections). (Burgess, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.