Barrett v. Upstart Network, Inc.
| Stephanie Rose Barrett |
| Upstart Network, Inc. and Does 1 through 100 inclusive |
| 6:2023cv01588 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael J McShane |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Upstart Network, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (jw) |
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael J. McShane and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 2/26/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/25/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 3/25/2024. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (jw)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $402 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9132534 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Stephanie Rose Barrett against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Schumacher, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
