Beltran v. Marion County Sheriff Department
Jose Manuel Beltran |
Marion County Sheriff Department, Deputy Frieze, Deputy Kevin Roberts, Jacob Stout, Brandon Gould, Joshua Baker, Daniel Claxton, Deputy Cheremoov and Deputy Drake Foust |
6:2023cv01912 |
December 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Michael W Mosman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff has neither submitted the $405.00 filing fee nor moved to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, should Plaintiff wish to continue with this case, he must submit the requisite filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to do so shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 1/23/2024 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/23/2024.) (dsg) |
Filing 4 Amended Complaint. Filed by Jose Manuel Beltran against All Defendants. (eo) |
Filing 3 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (ecp) |
Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/19/23.) (eo) |
Filing 1 Complaint. (No IFP Filed, No Filing Fee Paid) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Jose Manuel Beltran against Marion County Sheriff Department. (eo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.