Stapleton v. Sneak Peek LLC
David P. Stapleton |
Sneak Peak LLC |
6:2024cv00012 |
January 3, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Mustafa T Kasubhai |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: The Court having been informed by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled pursuant to LR 41-1(a), IT IS ORDERED that pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. All pretrial deadlines and any trial date are stricken. The parties are ordered to file final papers within 90 days from the date of this Order. (jk) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai GRANTING Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #18 . Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court #11 is due by 3/18/2024. (jk) |
Filing 19 Declaration of Craig G. Russillo in Support of Defendant The Sneak Peek Stapleton Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court. Filed by Sneak Peak LLC. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to a Motion, #18 .) (Russillo, Craig) |
Filing 18 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply Defendant The Sneak Peek Stapleton Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court to Motion to Remand to State Court #11 . Filed by Sneak Peak LLC. (Russillo, Craig) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai GRANTING Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #15 . Answer is due by 3/11/2024. (jk) |
Filing 16 Declaration of Craig G. Russillo in Support of Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Filed by Sneak Peak LLC. (Related document(s): Motion for Extension of Time to Answer a Complaint/Petition #15 .) (Russillo, Craig) |
Filing 15 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. (Related document: Notice of Removal #1 .) Filed by Sneak Peak LLC. (Russillo, Craig) Modified on 2/14/2024 to add document link and update docket text. Notice of Electronic Filing regenerated to the parties. (bd). |
Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai GRANTING Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #10 requested by attorney Oren Bitan. (jk) |
Filing 13 NOTICE BY THE CLERK: A dispositive motion has been filed in this case. Currently there is not full consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. If the non-consenting party or parties would like to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, the consent form may be found on the court's website at #ord.uscourts.gov/civil-forms and may be filed electronically by using the Consent event under Other Filings/Consent in the Civil menu or delivered to the Clerk's Office by mail or in person. The form is also attached to this docket entry. For more information regarding the role of magistrate judges and consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction, see #ord.uscourts.gov/consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, if any, is to be filed on or before the date briefing on the dispositive motion is complete. (jk) |
Filing 12 Declaration of David P. Stapleton in Support of Receiver's Motion for Remand. Filed by David P. Stapleton. (Related document(s): Motion to Remand #11 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Bitan, Oren) |
Filing 11 Motion to Remand to State Court. Oral Argument requested. Filed by David P. Stapleton. (Bitan, Oren) |
Filing 10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Oren Bitan. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9256810. Filed by David P. Stapleton. (Bitan, Oren) |
Clerk's Review of Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pro Hac Vice admission requested by attorney Oren Bitan. Filing fee in the amount of $300 collected; Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9256810 #10 : Reviewed and Ready for Ruling. (jw) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai GRANTING Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #6 . Answer is due by 2/9/2024. (jk) |
Filing 8 Case Management Order signed on 1/9/2024 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Sneak Peak LLC. (Russillo, Craig) |
Filing 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by Sneak Peak LLC. (Russillo, Craig) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO NON-ADMITTED COUNSEL: This case has been removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon from Lane County Circuit Court. Our records indicate that you are not admitted to practice in the District of Oregon. Admissions information is governed by LR 83, and information about the admissions process is available on the admissions page of the Court website. (bd) |
Filing 4 Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 5/3/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 6/3/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 6/3/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (bd) |
Filing 3 A duplicate payment in the amount of $405.00 was submitted by THE SNEAK PEAK LLC, an Ohio limited liability company in the above-referenced case. For information on refund procedures, visit #Requesting a Refund of Electronically Paid Fees on the Court's website. Refund Request is Due 1/16/2024. (nd) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet regarding Notice of Removal #1 . Filed by THE SNEAK PEAK LLC, an Ohio limited liability company. (Russillo, Craig) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 23CV46219 from Lane County. Filing Fee in amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: BORDC-9219421 issued.. Filed by THE SNEAK PEAK LLC, an Ohio limited liability company. (Russillo, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stapleton v. Sneak Peek LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David P. Stapleton | |
Represented By: | Daniel P. Larsen |
Represented By: | Oren Bitan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sneak Peak LLC | |
Represented By: | Craig G. Russillo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.