Murray v. DA's Office et al
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: DA's Office, Erik T. Knap, Judge McAlpine and Lane County & Assheits
Case Number: 6:2024cv00041
Filed: January 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Presiding Judge: Michael J McShane
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2024 Filing 7 JUDGMENT: This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed on 01/31/2024 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 01/31/2024.) (bd)
January 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed IFP (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a cognizable federal claim, and no amendment would cure its deficiencies. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and all pending motions are DENIED as moot. Any appeal of this Order or Judgment dismissing this case would be frivolous or not taken in good faith, and Plaintiff's IFP status is REVOKED. Signed on 01/31/2024 by Judge Michael J McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 01/31/2024.) (bd)
January 19, 2024 Filing 5 Motion to Produce (titled "Brady Motion to Prouduc [Sic]"). Filed by Johnny C Murray. (bd)
January 19, 2024 Filing 4 Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (bd)
January 11, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael J. McShane. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 01/11/2024.) (bd)
January 8, 2024 Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Johnny C Murray. (bd)
January 8, 2024 Filing 1 Complaint. (IFP Submitted) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Johnny C Murray against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet.) (bd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murray v. DA's Office et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DA's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erik T. Knap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge McAlpine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lane County & Assheits
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?