Shabazz v. Behavioral Health Services et al
Sheik King Sheik Shabazz |
Behavioral Health Services, Corporal W. Foster, Law Library Clerk, Brian Holoyda, Vitaly Chikrzov, Oregon Department of Corrections and State of Oregon |
6:2024cv00342 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Jolie A Russo |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Sheik King Sheik Shabazz. (le) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #1 is DENIED. Plaintiff may file an amended application curing the deficiency within 30 days of the date of this order. The amended application must bear the Civil No. 6:24-cv-00342-JR. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended application will result in the dismissal of this proceeding. Signed on 2/27/2024 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/27/2024.) (ecp) |
Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 02/27/2024.) (bd) |
Filing 2 Complaint. (IFP Submitted.) Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Sheik King Sheik Shabazz against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Attachment.) (bd) |
Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Sheik King Sheik Shabazz. (bd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.