Oravetz v. Navada State Treasury
| Mark Oravetz |
| Navada State Treasury |
| 6:2024cv00743 |
| May 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Order, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed on 6/20/2024 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/20/2024.) (ck)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and the time for doing so has passed. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice and final judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed on 6/20/2024 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 6/20/2024.) (ck)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Denying #7 Application of Mark Oravetz for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/23/2024.) (ck)
|
|
Filing 7
Application for CM/ECF Registration as a Self-Represented Party. Filed by Mark Oravetz. (le)
|
|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP petition #2 is DENIED and the Complaint #1 is DISMISSED without service on Defendant. Dismissal is with leave to amend and Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, the filing should be accompanied by payment of the filing fee. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended complaint within the allotted time will result in entry of a judgment of dismissal without further notice. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel #3 is DENIED. Signed on 5/9/2024 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/9/2024.) (ck)
|
|
Filing 5
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed on 5/3/2024 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/3/2024.) (ck)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/3/2024.) (jw)
|
|
Filing 3
Motion for Appointment of Pro Bono Counsel. Filed by Mark Oravetz. (jw)
|
|
Filing 2
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Mark Oravetz. (jw)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Mark Oravetz against Navada State Treasury. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (jw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oravetz v. Navada State Treasury | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Oravetz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Navada State Treasury | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
