Terry v. St. Charles Health System, Inc.
| Jay Terry |
| St. Charles Health System, Inc. |
| 6:2024cv01096 |
| July 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael J McShane |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit from Scheduling Order,,,, 3 , Judgment #4 Filing fee $605 collected; Agency Tracking ID BORDC-9558041: . Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Janzen, Paul Robert) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Based on the record, this case is dismissed. Signed on 7/31/2024 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) |
Filing 3
Order: The Complaint alleges the same facts and issues that were originally plead in Bowerman et al v. St. Charles Health Sys., Case No. 6:23-cv-01488-MC. "Res judicata, also known as claim preclusion, bars litigation in a subsequent action of any claims that were raised or could have been raised in the prior action" GP Vincent II v. Est. of Beard, 68 F.4th 508, 514 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation omitted). Because this action involves the same identity of claims and claims and a final judgment on the merits, Plaintiff's claims are therefore barred by res judicata. See Stratosphere Litig. L.L.C. v. Grand Casinos, Inc., 298 F.3d 1137, 1143 n.3 (9th Cir. 2002) (listing elements of res judicata doctrine); Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp, 298 F.3d 965, 957 (9th Cir. 2002) ("A dismissal for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted serves as a final judgment on the merits."). Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) Modified on 7/18/2024 to correct docket text(cp).
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael J. McShane and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 11/4/2024. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 12/2/2024. Pretrial Order is due by 12/2/2024. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (sss)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $405 collected. Agency Tracking ID: AORDC-9481049 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Jay Terry against St. Charles Health System, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Janzen, Caroline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Terry v. St. Charles Health System, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jay Terry | |
| Represented By: | Paul Robert Armstrong Janzen |
| Represented By: | Caroline Janzen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: St. Charles Health System, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
