Hanna v. Smith
| Johnathan William Hanna |
| Benjamin Thomas Smith |
| 6:2025cv01613 |
| September 8, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael W Mosman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER: Granting Motion for a Protective Order #9 . Signed on 1/12/2026 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 1/12/2026.) (kms)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order . Filed by Benjamin Thomas Smith. (Maile, Rebecca) |
|
Filing 8
Scheduling Order for Civil Rights Actions Filed by Incarcerated Plaintiffs. All pretrial, discovery, and dispositive motions are due by 4/2/2026. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/3/25.) (sb)
|
| Filing 7 Answer to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand. . Filed by Benjamin Thomas Smith. (Maile, Rebecca) |
| Filing 6 Waiver of Service. Filed by Benjamin Thomas Smith. (Maile, Rebecca) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons. Notice and complaint or amended complaint forwarded to the Oregon Department of Justice on 10/7/2025. Waiver of Service is due by 11/5/2025. Signed on 10/06/2025 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/08/2025.) (hm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff's provisional in forma pauperis status is CONFIRMED. IT IS ORDERED that the Oregon Department of Corrections shall collect payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account and forward those payments to the Clerk of Court in accordance with the formula set forth in the order until a total of $350.00 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk of Court. The payments shall be clearly identified by the name and number assigned to this action.The Clerk of Court is directed to send an electronic copy of this order to: [email protected]. Signed on 10/06/2025 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/08/2025.) (hm)
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 09/08/2025.) (hm) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. (IFP Submitted) Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Johnathan William Hanna against Benjamin Thomas Smith (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (hm) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Johnathan William Hanna. (hm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hanna v. Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Johnathan William Hanna | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Benjamin Thomas Smith | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Maile |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
