Santos v. Johnson et al
| Aleida Selegna Santos |
| Kathleen Johnson, Carol McCurry, Public Defenders, Oregon State Bar and Allison Eichmann |
| 6:2025cv01913 |
| October 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Jolie A Russo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Response to Order to Show Cause. Filed by Aleida Selegna Santos. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (le) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [ 1] is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin or his designee must collect payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account and forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court in accordance with the formula set forth above until a total of $350.00 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. The payments shall be clearly identified by the name and number assigned to this action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send an copy of this order to: John Hanlin, Douglas County Sheriff, 1036 SE Douglas Avenue, Roseburg, OR 97470. #1 . Signed on 12/12/2025 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/12/2025.) (hm)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff must show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this Order why this action should not be summarily dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Failure to file a response to this Order will result in the entry of an order and judgment of dismissal. In light of the requirement for plaintiff to show cause why her Complaint should not be dismissed, the Court DENIES plaintiff's request #5 to consolidate this case with her other pending civil rights case, No. 6:25-cv-01913-JR. In light of the requirement for plaintiff to show cause why her original Complaint should not be dismissed and because they do not comply with Local Rule 15, the Court DENIES plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint #6 without prejudice to plaintiff's right to renew the motion should this case proceed Signed on 12/10/2025 by Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 12/12/2025.) (hm)
|
| Filing 6 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Filed by Aleida Selegna Santos. (le) |
| Filing 5 Motion to Consolidate. Filed by Aleida Selegna Santos. (le) |
| Filing 4 Declination of Individual Party Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. (le) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 10/23/2025.) (le) |
| Filing 2 Complaint. (IFP Submitted) Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by Aleida Selegna Santos against All Defendants. (le) |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Filed by Aleida Selegna Santos. (le) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
