Hires v. Diegel
| Bruce Eugene Hires |
| James Diegel |
| 6:2026cv00949 |
| May 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Amy M Baggio |
| Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Sua Sponte Order Appointing Counsel: The Federal Public Defender, 101 S.W. Main, Suite 1700, Portland, Oregon 97204, is sua sponte appointed to represent Petitioner in this proceeding. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B). With the assistance of newly appointed counsel, Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition within 30 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to send the Federal Public Defender a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed on 7/1/26 by Judge Amy M. Baggio.(Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/1/2026.) (eo)
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Petitioner's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Petition #4 , liberally construed as a Motion to Substitute Party, is GRANTED. James Diegel, Superintendent, Oregon State Hospital, is substituted as Respondent. Ordered by Judge Amy M. Baggio. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 7/1/26.) (eo)
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Leave to Amended Petition. Filed by Bruce Eugene Hires. (eo) |
| Filing Fee in amount of $5.00 collected; Receipt No. 117217 issued. (rhb) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Should Petitioner wish to continue with this case, within 30 days of the date of this Order he must: (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) file an amended habeas corpus petition in which he names his custodian as the Respondent to this action. Any amended petition must be on the form provided by the Court and must not incorporate any part of the original Petition (ECF No. #1 ) by reference. The Court advises Petitioner that his failure to do so shall result in the dismissal of this proceeding. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a form application to proceed in forma pauperis, and instructions and a form petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 5/14/2026 by Judge Amy M. Baggio. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 5/14/2026.) (pvh)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Amy M. Baggio. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 05/13/2026.) (et) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254 - State) (No IFP Filed, No Filing Fee Paid). Filed by Bruce Eugene Hires against Multnomah County Court. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hires v. Diegel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Bruce Eugene Hires | |
| Represented By: | Fidel Cassino-DuCloux |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: James Diegel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.