WHITE v. VAUGHN, et al
Petitioner: MICHAEL WHITE
Respondent: DONALD T. VAUGHN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Case Number: 2:1994cv06598
Filed: October 31, 1994
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: JOHN R. PADOVA
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 95 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PETITIONERS AMENDED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 60(B)(6) IS GRANTED. THIS COURTS PRIOR JUDGMENT DISMISSING PETITIONERS PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS(DOC. NO. 17 ) IS VACATED INSOFAR AS IT DENIED AS PROCEDURALLY DEFAULTED PETITIONERS CLAIMTHAT THE PROSECUTION VIOLATED BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U.S 83 (1963), BY FAILING TO DISCLOSE THEARREST RECORD OF GEORGELL LEWIS.PETITIONERS PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED AS TO THAT PROSECUTORIALM ISCONDUCT CLAIM BASED ON BRADY, AND PETITIONERS CONVICTION AND SENTENCE ARE VACATED.THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IS DIRECTED TO RETRY OR RELEASE PETITIONERWITHIN 180 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 12/29/22. 12/29/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THIS COURT WILL SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE PARTIES MAY PRESENT EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT IN CONNECTION WITH PETITIONER'S MOTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 9/6/22. 9/6/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
February 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S INDEPENDENT ACTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER DENYING SECTION 2254 HABEAS CORPUS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60 F.R.CIV.P. IS DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 2/7/18. 2/8/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITE v. VAUGHN, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MICHAEL WHITE
Represented By: CHERYL J. STURM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DONALD T. VAUGHN
Represented By: DONNA G. ZUCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Represented By: DONNA G. ZUCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Represented By: DONNA G. ZUCKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?