JOHNSON v. VAUGHN

JOHNSON v. VAUGHN

Case Number:	2:2000cv02334
Filed:	May 5, 2000
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
Presiding Judge:	ARNOLD C. RAPOPORT
Presiding Judge:	PETRESE B. TUCKER
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 24, 2018	Filing 117 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b), FED.R.CIV.P. IS DENIED; PETITIONER'S MOTION TO TRANSFER TO CURE WANT OF JURISDICTION IS DENIED; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 5/23/18. 5/24/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
November 19, 2013	Filing 95 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT IS DENIED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CONSOLIDATED RESPONSES IS MOOT; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 11/18/13. 11/19/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 24, 2018

Filing 117 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b), FED.R.CIV.P. IS DENIED; PETITIONER'S MOTION TO TRANSFER TO CURE WANT OF JURISDICTION IS DENIED; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 5/23/18. 5/24/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

November 19, 2013

Filing 95 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT IS DENIED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CONSOLIDATED RESPONSES IS MOOT; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 11/18/13. 11/19/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JOHNSON v. VAUGHN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?