E.E.O.C. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE
| EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
| ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| GEORGE R. ROMERO, et al |
| 2:2001cv07042 |
| December 27, 2001 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| RONALD L. BUCKWALTER |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 626 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
ORDER THAT THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO BAR AND EXCLUDE REFERENCES; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO BAR AND EXCLUDE; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO BAR AN D EXCLUDE REFERENCES; ALLSTATE'S MOITON TO EXCLUDE SALES ORGANIZATION; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO BAR AND PRECLUDE ANY REFERENCES; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE HEARSAY; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE T ESTIMONY; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO BAR AND EXCLUDE EVIDENCE; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO BAR EVIDENCE; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO BAR AND PRECLUDE EVIDENCE; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO SEQUESTER; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO BAR AND EXCLUDE REFERENCES; ALLS TATE'S MOTION TO BAR AND EXCLUDE; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS FROM ARGUING; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO RENEW ITS MOTIONS; ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO MODIFY STATEMENT; PLAINTIFFS' ; RENEWED MOTION IN LIMINE TO COMPEL; PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED MOTION TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY; AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND. THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT, ALLSTATE'S MOTION TO DISMISS; DEFENDANT EDWARD M. LIDDY'S MOTION TO DISMISS; ALLSTATE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS; AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 1/26/16. 1/28/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED. (ti, )
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION IS DENIED; AND THE MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF MARTIN H. REDISH IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/6/14. 10/6/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER THAT ALLSTATE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED AND THE COURT CLARIFIES THAT ITS 2/27/2014 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING THE PARTIES' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE RELEASE DOES NOT OPERATE TO ADJUDICATE ANY ASPECT OF PLAINTIFFS' UNDERLYING BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS. ALLSTATE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 4/7/14. 4/7/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER THAT THE EEOC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 124 OF CIV. A. NO. 01-7042) IS DENIED. ALLSTATE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 369 OF CIV. A. NO. 01-3894) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF ALLSTATE AND AGA INST THE EEOC ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE EEOC'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (CIV. A. NO. 01-7042). CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 01-7042 IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 3/13/14. 3/13/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (ti, ) Modified on 3/13/2014 (ti, ).
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ALLSTATE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANT LIDDY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 2/27/14. 2/28/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (ti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
