MARSHALL v. BEARD et al
| JEROME MARSHALL |
| JEFFREY A. BEARD, WILLIAMS S. STICKMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2003cv03308 |
| March 31, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| THOMAS M. GOLDEN |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
181
ORDER OF 11/06/2018 THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PETITIONER'S TWO DEATH SENTENCES ARE VACATED. THE EXECUTION OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS STAYED FOR 180 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO PERMIT THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA TO GRANT PETITIONER A NEW SENTENCING HEARING. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. 11/6/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
|
|
Filing
141
OPINION/ORDER (FILED UNDER SEAL). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 3/21/16. 3/24/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (ky, )
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION/ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RENEWED DISCOVERY IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS M. GOLDEN ON 3/30/10. 3/31/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
