GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY v. FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO. et al
2:2004cv03509 |
July 23, 2004 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
LINDA K. CARACAPPA |
EDMUND V. LUDWIG |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 694 ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (DOC. 686 ) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF GRC, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT TRAVELERS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $21 MILLION U.S. DO LLAR. PREJUDGMENT INTEREST IS AWARDED IN ADDITION TO THE STIPULATED DAMAGES AS OUTLINED HEREIN. A TOTAL JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF GRC AND AGAINST DEFENDANT TRAVELERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,273,705.00 U.S. DOLLARS. ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED AND TERMINATED, AND TO REMOVE THIS ACTION FROM THE COURT'S ACTIVE DOCKET. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 9/9/2015. 9/9/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 672 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE THE PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE (DOC. 651 ) IS DENIED. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 6/11/2015. 6/12/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 665 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIF FROM PRESENTING EVIDENCE OF DAMAGES (DOC. 649 ) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT AT THE TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 6/15/2015 DEFEDANT TRANVELERS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO INTRODUCE INTO EVIDENCE ANY EVIDENCE OR ARGUEMENT RELATED TO THE INSURANCE POLICY ISSUED BY THE INUSRANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 6/1/2015. 6/1/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 663 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO PRECLUDE ADMISSION OF PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENCE (DOC. NO. 650 ) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS PROFFERED TRIAL EXHIBITS ARE SUMMARIES OF BUSINESS RECORDS ADMISSIBLE UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 5/29/2015. 5/29/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 637 ORDERED THAT THE "ASBESTOS EXCLUSION" CONTAINED IN THE "EXCESS OVERLAYER INDEMNITY" INSURANCE POLICIES IS AMBIGUOUS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ASBESTOS EXCLUSION THAT FAVORS INSURANCE PROTECTION FOR THE POLICYHOLDER, PLAINTIFF GRC APPLIES AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 3/3/2015. 3/3/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 529 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 9/25/2013. 9/27/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 462 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. THE 4/27/2012 ORDER (DOC. NO. 459) ACCOMPANIES THIS MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 5/4/2012. 5/4/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 457 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S AND AIU INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S AND AIU INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURTS ORDER AND OPINION ENTERED ON 1/30/2012 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 4/26/2012. 4/27/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 447 ORDERED THAT CERTAIN DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM IS GRANTED AND CERTAIN DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURTS ORDER AND OPINION ENTERED ON 2/22/2012 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 4/19/2012. 4/20/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 433 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED ON PLAINTIFF'S LACK OF DAMAGES (DOC. #346) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 3/26/2012; 3/27/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(tomg, ) |
Filing 429 ORDER THAT THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS LISTED HEREIN ARE DENIED IN THAT EACH ONE INVOLVES TRIABLE ISSUES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 3/21/2012. 3/21/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 418 ORDER THAT THE FOLLOWING ARE DENIED: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY AND FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON REGULATORY ISSUES. LEXINGTON INS URANCE COMPANY AND AIU INSURANCE COMPANY'S JOINDER IN HARTFORD AND FIRST STATE'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON REGULATORY ISSUES. CERTAIN DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE AND DISREGARD THE DECLARATION OF MICAHEL R. POWERS, PH.D.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 2/21/2012. 2/22/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 411 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 2/7/2012. 2/7/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 409 ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY TO INTERVENE AS A DEFENDANT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 1/27/2012. 1/30/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 320 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 6/20/2011. 6/21/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY v. FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.