RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. v. MACK TRUCKS, INC.

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. v. MACK TRUCKS, INC.

RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. v. MACK TRUCKS, INC.

Plaintiff:	RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. and RDK MUNICIPAL TRUCK CENTER, INC.
Defendant:	MACK TRUCKS, INC., HEIL ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. and MCNEILUS TRUCK & MANUFACTURING, INC.
Counter_claimant:	MACK TRUCKS, INC.
Counter_defendant:	RDK MUNICIPAL TRUCK CENTER, INC. and RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC.
Case Number:	2:2004cv04007
Filed:	August 23, 2004
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge:	RONALD L. BUCKWALTER
Nature of Suit:	Antitrust
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 19, 2009	Filing 100 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THIS COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. RDK'S FEDERAL AND STATE ANTITRUST CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY. SUMMARY DISMISALL OF RDK' S STATE LAW CLAIMS, AS THEY APPLY TO MACK, MCNEILUS AND HEIL IS DENIED. RDK'S STATE LAW CLAIMS, AS THEY APPLY TO THE ALLEGED CONSPIRACY BETWEEN MACK AND ITS DEALERS, ARE DISMISSED. RDK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON MACK'S COUNTERCLA IMS IS GRANTED AND DENIED IN PART. WITH REGARD TO THE TWO ALLEGED RDK-NEXTRAN TRANSACTIONS, SUMMARY DISMISSAL IS GRANTED. WITH REGARD TO THE SEVENTEEN RDK-WORLDWIDE AND SIXTY-TWO RDK-DALLAS MACK TRANSACTIONS, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 5/19/09. 5/20/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jl, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 19, 2009

Filing 100 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THIS COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. RDK'S FEDERAL AND STATE ANTITRUST CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY. SUMMARY DISMISALL OF RDK' S STATE LAW CLAIMS, AS THEY APPLY TO MACK, MCNEILUS AND HEIL IS DENIED. RDK'S STATE LAW CLAIMS, AS THEY APPLY TO THE ALLEGED CONSPIRACY BETWEEN MACK AND ITS DEALERS, ARE DISMISSED. RDK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON MACK'S COUNTERCLA IMS IS GRANTED AND DENIED IN PART. WITH REGARD TO THE TWO ALLEGED RDK-NEXTRAN TRANSACTIONS, SUMMARY DISMISSAL IS GRANTED. WITH REGARD TO THE SEVENTEEN RDK-WORLDWIDE AND SIXTY-TWO RDK-DALLAS MACK TRANSACTIONS, SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 5/19/09. 5/20/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC. v. MACK TRUCKS, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC.
Represented By:	DAVID ANDREW DEGNAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: RDK MUNICIPAL TRUCK CENTER, INC.
Represented By:	DAVID ANDREW DEGNAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MACK TRUCKS, INC.
Represented By:	BARAK BASSMAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: HEIL ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Represented By:	DONALD J. AHO
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MCNEILUS TRUCK & MANUFACTURING, INC.
Represented By:	THOMAS K. ANDERSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Counter_claimant: MACK TRUCKS, INC.
Represented By:	BARAK BASSMAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Counter_defendant: RDK MUNICIPAL TRUCK CENTER, INC.
Represented By:	DAVID ANDREW DEGNAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Counter_defendant: RDK TRUCK SALES AND SERVICE, INC.
Represented By:	DAVID ANDREW DEGNAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?