MADDEN et al v. THE A.I. DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN OF THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION et al
| 2:2005cv00787 |
| February 18, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CHRISTIAN PIZARRO M.D.'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH AMATO, M.D. AS AN EXPERT WITNESS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S INFORMED CONSENT CLAIM ARE DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/27/10. 1/28/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS WILLIAM I. NORWOOD, M.D. PH.D'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE MOTION OF DR. NORWOOD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ALSO RAISED IN THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILL BE GRANTED AS DR. NORWOOD ONLY; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 12/24/09. 12/24/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MADDEN et al v. THE A.I. DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN OF THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
