BOURNE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District BOURNE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

BOURNE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Case Number:	2:2006cv00293
Filed:	January 23, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
Presiding Judge:	CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 3, 2011	Filing 145 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: THE CLERK'S TAXATION OF COSTS AND JUDGMENT TAXING COSTS IN FAVOR OF LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND TROY WALTZ ARE VACATED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND TROY WALTZ AND AGAINST ROBERT M. BOURNE IN THE AMOUNT OF $500.00. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 2/2/11. 2/3/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb)
October 27, 2009	Filing 97 ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS IV, V, VII OF PLFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE MOTION IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFT WALTZ AND AGAINST PLFF ON COUNTS IV AND V, A ND IN FAVOR OF ALL DEFTS AND AGAINST PLFF ON COUNTS VII AND VIII. WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS I AND II, THE MOTION IS DENIED. WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS III AND VI, THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFTS LANCAS TER COUNTY PRISON AND GUARINI AND AGAINST PLFF ON COUNT VI. DEFTS LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND GUARINI ARE DISMISSED AS PARTIES TO THIS ACTION. DEFTS LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND GUARINI ARE DISMISSED AS PARTIES TO THIS ACTION. TRIAL IN THIS MATTER IS SCHEDULED FOR 1/19/10, AT 10:00 A.M.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 10/27/09. 10/28/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 3, 2011

Filing 145 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: THE CLERK'S TAXATION OF COSTS AND JUDGMENT TAXING COSTS IN FAVOR OF LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND TROY WALTZ ARE VACATED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND TROY WALTZ AND AGAINST ROBERT M. BOURNE IN THE AMOUNT OF $500.00. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 2/2/11. 2/3/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb)

October 27, 2009

Filing 97 ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS IV, V, VII OF PLFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE MOTION IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFT WALTZ AND AGAINST PLFF ON COUNTS IV AND V, A ND IN FAVOR OF ALL DEFTS AND AGAINST PLFF ON COUNTS VII AND VIII. WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS I AND II, THE MOTION IS DENIED. WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS III AND VI, THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFTS LANCAS TER COUNTY PRISON AND GUARINI AND AGAINST PLFF ON COUNT VI. DEFTS LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND GUARINI ARE DISMISSED AS PARTIES TO THIS ACTION. DEFTS LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND GUARINI ARE DISMISSED AS PARTIES TO THIS ACTION. TRIAL IN THIS MATTER IS SCHEDULED FOR 1/19/10, AT 10:00 A.M.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 10/27/09. 10/28/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOURNE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?