M.L. ROBERT, II, L.L.C. et al v. EASTERN MUSHROOM MARKETING COOPERATIVE, INC. et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv00861
Filed: February 27, 2006
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
Presiding Judge: THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 14, 2014 145 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 513 IN 06-CV-620) IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT THAT IT SEEKS RECONSIDERATION OF MY DECISION OF 3/26/09 AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/14/14. 10/14/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(rf, )
October 22, 2012 111 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS OF M.D. BASCIANI AND BFI ARE OVERRULED AND THE ORDER DATED 8/21/12 IS AFFIRMED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/22/12. 10/23/12 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
January 31, 2012 96 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL CERTAIN DISCOVERY FROM NON-PARTY BASCIANI FOODS INC IS GRANTED. BFIS MOTION TO QUASH IS DENIED AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 1/31/12. 2/1/12 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: M.L. ROBERT, II, L.L.C. et al v. EASTERN MUSHROOM MARKETING COOPERATIVE, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?