DIMEO v. MAX
Plaintiff Anthony DiMeo, III alleged that defendant Tucker Max published defamatory statements about himn at www.tuckermax.com.
Additional Resources
- DiMeo v. Max Affirmed by Third Circuit. Professor Eric Goldman's Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
- Online Message Board Protected by 47 USC 230--DiMeo v. Max. Professor Eric Goldman's Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
ANTHONY DIMEO, III |
TUCKER MAX |
2:2006cv01544 |
April 12, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
STEWART DALZELL |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0151 Communications Act of 1934 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
17
Copy of TPO Form re: Notice of Appeal. (ac, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2007 (jl, ).
|
Filing
16
Clerk's Notice to USCA re: Notice of Appeal. (ac, )
|
Filing
12
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S PETITION TO REMAND IS DENIED AND DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE STEWART DALZELL ON 05/25/06. 05/26/06 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. COPIES FAXED BY CHAMBERS 05/25/06.(ac, )
|
Filing
10
ORDER THAT THE REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS IS DENIED. BY NOON ON MAY 12, 2006, PLAINTIFF MAY SUBMIT A CONSOLIDATED SUR-REPLY MEMORANDUM NO TO EXCEED TEN PAGES IN LENGTH. SIGNED BY JUDGE STEWART DALZELL ON 05/10/06. 05/12/06 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. COPIES FAXED BY CHAMBERS 05/10/06.(ac, )
|
Filing
9
Deft's OPPOSITON to Plff's Petition for Remand to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County and STAY Deft's Pending Motion to Dismiss filed by TUCKER MAX. Cert. of Service. (pr, )
|
Filing
6
ORDER THAT BY NOON ON 5/9/06, DEFENDANT SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND BY THE SAME TIME AND DATE, DEFENDANT MAY FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS; ETC.. SIGNED BY JUDGE STEWART DALZELL ON 5/3/06. 5/4/06 ENTERED AND E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(jl, )
|
Filing
5
RESPONSE to Motion re 2 MOTION to Dismiss proposed Order filed by ANTHONY DIMEO, III. (WEISBERG, MATTHEW)
|
Filing
1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TUCKER MAX from Philadelphia CCP, case number March 2006 No. 1576. (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 927450-51), Certificate of Service. (tj, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 4/12/2006 (tj, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DIMEO v. MAX | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ANTHONY DIMEO, III | |
Represented By: | MATTHEW B. WEISBERG |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: TUCKER MAX | |
Represented By: | MICHAEL K. TWERSKY |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.