MARKOCKI v. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
2:2006cv02422 |
June 8, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
PETRESE B. TUCKER |
Other Statutory Actions |
12 U.S.C. ยง 2609 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 255 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT OLD REPUBLICS MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS (DOC. 213 ) IS GRANTED AS TO THE PENNSYLVANIA UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW (UTPCPL) CLAIM AND DENIED AS TO THE REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES ACT (RESPA) CLAIM; T HIRD PARTY DEFENDANT CITIZENS MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS (DOC. 216 ) IS GRANTED AS TO THE UTPCPL CLAIM AND DENIED AS TO THE RESPA CLAIM; PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 168 ) IS DENIED; DEFENDANT OLD REPUBLICS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 181 ) IS DENIED AS TO THE UTPCPL CLAIM AND GRANTED AS TO THE RESPA CLAIM; AND THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT CITIZENS MOTION FOR JOINDER OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 182 ) IS DENIED. ETC. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 5/26/15. 5/28/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MARKOCKI v. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.