BURGOS et al v. CANINO et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv02497
Filed: July 26, 2006
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Prison Condition Office
Presiding Judge: ANITA B. BRODY
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 20, 2009 133 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER to MEMORANDUM (DOC.#132) - UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL FOR DEFENDANTS HEARING EXAMINER MARY CANINO, SUPERINTENDENT DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER LEVI HOSBAND, ACTIVIES MANAGER TONY WOLFE, CO I II DAY, CO I CUDDEBACK AND CO I ADRIANO CARRETE (DOC. #69), AND THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO ALL COUNTS OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL FOR DEFENDANTS LIEUTENANT M. DOYLE, CO I SCOTT DAVIES, CO I KYUNGKUK CHO, AND CO I MICHAEL BARRATA (DOC. #109), AND THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO, DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO ALL COU NTS OF AMENDED COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF PLAINTIFF NAZARIO BURGOS(DOC. #118) IS DENIED ON ALL COUNTS.1(footnote). SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 7/20/2009. 7/20/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BURGOS et al v. CANINO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?