ABDULLAH v. WARDEN SCI DALLAS et al
2:2006cv03885 |
August 31, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
R. BARCLAY SURRICK |
CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT A HEARING; FURTHER ORDERED THAT NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2253 BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS FAILED TO MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF A DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 5/13/15. 5/14/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, ). |
Filing 26 ORDER THAT: PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 2/9/10. 2/9/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ABDULLAH v. WARDEN SCI DALLAS et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.