ABDULLAH v. WARDEN SCI DALLAS et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv03885
Filed: August 31, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
Presiding Judge: R. BARCLAY SURRICK
Presiding Judge: CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT A HEARING; FURTHER ORDERED THAT NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2253 BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS FAILED TO MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF A DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 5/13/15. 5/14/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, ).
February 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER THAT: PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 2/9/10. 2/9/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ABDULLAH v. WARDEN SCI DALLAS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?