MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION v. S.F. ADVISORS, LLC et al
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION |
S.F. ADVISORS, LLC, RAVI V. KOTHARE and DAVID M. MASER |
2:2006cv05211 |
November 28, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
J. CURTIS JOYNER |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
28
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND PLACE THE MATTER IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE PENDING DISPOSITION IN A RELATED ACTION. SIGNED BY JUDGE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 3/15/07. 3/19/07 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED.(le, )
|
Filing
26
NOTICE of Hearing:TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 3/14/2007 04:30 PM IN JUDGE'S CHAMBERS BEFORE HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER.(sc, )
|
Filing
25
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS, S.F. ADVISORS D/B/A AFFINITY CLUB NETWORK, LLC, RAVI V. KOTHARE AND DAVID M. MASER'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO MOVING DEFENDANTS' RIGHT TO RE-FILE THEIR MOTION FOR DISMISSAL AS TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IF APPROPRIATE. SIGNED BY JUDGE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 2/21/07.2/22/07 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED.(le, )
|
Filing
23
RESPONSE in Opposition re 21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (SALMON, TRAVIS) Modified on 2/16/2007 (afm, ).
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION of Dismissal of Defendant John Larocca with Proposed Order by MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, S.F. ADVISORS, LLC, JOHN LAROCCA, RAVI V. KOTHARE, DAVID M. MASER. (MILLER, CAMILLE)
|
Filing
21
MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY S.F. ADVISORS, LLC, RAVI V. KOTHARE AND DAVID M. MASERWITH MEMORANDUM AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(le, )
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS, SF ADVISORS, RAVI KOTHARE AND DAVID MASER SHALL HAVE AN EXTENSION UNTIL 1/29/2007 TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO THE COMPLAINT INCLUDING A MOTION TO DISMISS. SIGNED BY JUDGE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 1/18/07. 1/19/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED.(le, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 5/15/2007 (le, ).
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS, S.F. ADVISORS, LLC, RAVI V. KOTHARE AND DAVID M. MASER SHALL HAVE AN EXTENSION UNTIL 1/20/2007 TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT OR OTHERWISE PLEAD. SIGNED BY JUDGE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 1/4/07. 1/5/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED.(le, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 5/15/2007 (le, ).
|
Filing
18
Defendant, John LaRocca's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Proof of Filing and/or Service by JOHN LAROCCA.(MCVAN, BRIAN)
|
Filing
17
NOTICE of Appearance by BRIAN P. MCVAN on behalf of JOHN LAROCCA (MCVAN, BRIAN)
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION between Plaintiff and S.F. Advisors, Ravi Kothare and David Maser for the Entry of a Preliminary Injunction by MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION. (MILLER, CAMILLE) Modified on 12/12/2006 (cdd, ). (FILED IN ERROR BY ATTORNEY; FORWARDED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL)
|
Filing
11
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR THE PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF TRAVIS L. SALMON, ESQUIRE IS HEREBY GRANTED. SIGNED BY JUDGE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 12/7/06. 12/11/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(le, )
|
Filing
8
Application for the Pro Hac Vice Admission of Travis L. Salmon, Esquire filed by MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION with Statement and Certificate of Service. (le, )
|
Filing
5
Copy of Form to Commissioner of Patents. (cw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.