LUCAS v. PIAZZA et al
KIRK LUCAS |
JOSEPH PIAZZA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2007cv03556 |
August 24, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Northumberland |
LOWELL A. REED |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO RECONSIDER IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH AT THE CONCLUSION OF MY MEMORANDUM OF 8/5/2010 (DOC. NO. 27), THERE IS NO NEED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALA BILITY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2253 BECAUSE LUCAS HAS FAILED TO MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOWELL A. REED, JR ON 11/16/2010. 11/18/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jmf, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DENIED IWTH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT A HEARING. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL BE ISSUED, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOWELL A. REED, JR ON 8/5/10. 8/5/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED. (COPY TO PRO SE)(lvj, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CONTINUE THE STAY OF HIS HABEAS PETITION IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOWELL A. REED, JR ON 10/19/09. 10/21/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(lvj, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.