CZARNECKI et al v. KRAUSE, INC. et al
Plaintiff: JAMES CZARNECKI and ANNE CZARNECKI
Defendant: KRAUSE, INC. and HOME DEPOT, INC.
Case Number: 2:2007cv04384
Filed: October 19, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Bucks
Presiding Judge: HARVEY BARTLE
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER THAT AFTER CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTIONS IN LIMINE, AND ALL RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO RESPONSES THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DOC 51 , IS DENIED AS MOOT IN LIGHT OF PRIOR RULING ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MR. JOHANSON'S TESTIMONY; DOC. [5 2], IS GRANTED; DOC. 53 , IS DENIED; DOC. 54 , IS GRANTED; DOCS. 55 AND 56 ARE DENIED; DOC. 57 , IS DENIED AS TO EVIDENCE OF MR. CZARNECKI'S ALLEGED MISUSE OF THE LADDER, AND DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO CHARGING THE JURY ON ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK; DOC. 58 , IS GRANTED; DOC. 59 , IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT DEFENDANT WILL BE PRECLUDED FROM PRESENTING VISUAL EVIDENCE OF DR. QUAN'S SHAKE TEST OR ANY TEST USING AN EXEMPLAR LADDER IN OTHER THAN ITS STRAIGHT CONFIGURATION, AND IS OTHERWISE DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 6/15/09. 6/16/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
June 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER THAT AFTER CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 47 , PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE THERETO 50 , AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY 60 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNTS I AND II ARE HEREBY DISMISSED ON PLAINTIFFS' REPRESENTATION THAT THEY ARE WITHDRAWN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 6/3/09. 6/4/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CZARNECKI et al v. KRAUSE, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES CZARNECKI
Represented By: THOMAS S. FARNISH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANNE CZARNECKI
Represented By: THOMAS S. FARNISH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KRAUSE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HOME DEPOT, INC.
Represented By: BRYAN P. WERLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?