SEGAL et al v. STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
Plaintiff: |
KENNETH SEGAL, ADAM SEGAL and SEGAL AND MOREL, INC. |
Defendant: |
STRAUSSER ENTERPRISES, INC., GARY STRAUSSER and LEONARD MELLON |
Case Number: |
2:2007cv04647 |
Filed: |
November 5, 2007 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Office: |
Philadelphia Office |
County: |
Outside the State of PA. |
Presiding Judge: |
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER |
Presiding Judge: |
HENRY S. PERKIN |
Nature of Suit: |
Contract: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 30, 2021 |
Filing
656
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT MELLON'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR REPLY IS GRANTED AS THE COURT REVIEW THE SUR REPLY IN COMING TO THIS DECISION; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THEIR AMENDE D COMPLAINT WITHIN FIVE DAYS AND DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF PLAINTIFFS' FILING OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 09/30/2021. 09/30/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nd, )
|
October 24, 2019 |
Filing
443
ORDER THAT STRAUSSER DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY (ECF DOCKET NO. 427 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 10/24/19. 10/25/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO ATTORNEYS AND E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
June 12, 2019 |
Filing
412
ORDER OF 6/12/2019 THAT AFTER REVIEWING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC NOS. 394 & 397), ALL SUPPORTING AND OPPOSING PAPERS, AND FOR THE REASONS MORE FULLY STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/12/19. 6/12/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(DT)
|
August 8, 2013 |
Filing
340
OPINION/ORDER THAT THE STRAUSSER DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF TAX RETURNS OF MR. SEGAL AND THE TRUST IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 8/8/13. 8/8/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
February 10, 2012 |
Filing
267
OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S LETTER MOTION TO COMPEL THE STRAUSSER DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO THEM BY LAFAYETTE BANK IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 2/10/12. 2/10/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
August 12, 2011 |
Filing
218
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT LEONARD MELLON, ESQUIRE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT MELLON SHALL HAVE UNTIL 9/1/2011 TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 8/11/2011. 8/12/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(stwe, )
|
March 2, 2011 |
Filing
199
MEMORANDUM/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' LETTER MOTION #195 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 3/1/11. 3/2/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
March 1, 2011 |
Filing
198
MEMORANDUM/OPINION THAT PLAINTIFFS' DECEMBER 1, 2010 LETTER MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 3/1/11. 3/2/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
October 7, 2010 |
Filing
180
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO QUASH ARE GRANTED IN PART; ALL REQUESTS FOR SANCTIONS ARE DENIED; AND DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF THE SUBPOENA IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 10/7/10. 10/8/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
November 19, 2009 |
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM OPINION THAT DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY LITIGATION AND COMPEL ARBITRATION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 11/19/09. 11/19/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?