ROBINSON v. TENNIS

ROBINSON v. TENNIS

Petitioner:	DONNELL ROBINSON
Respondent:	FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Case Number:	2:2007cv04676
Filed:	November 7, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 29, 2010	Filing 20 ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS OF PETITIONER TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RAPOPORT ARE OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RAPOPORT IS APROVED AND ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED T HAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT A HEARING. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS NOT MET STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE HIS CASE HEARD, AND NO REASONABLE JURIST COULD FIND THIS PROCEDURAL RULING DEBATABLE, AND BECAUSE PETITIONER FAILS TO DEMONSTRATE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 11/29/2010. 11/29/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )

Date Filed

Document Text

November 29, 2010

Filing 20 ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS OF PETITIONER TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RAPOPORT ARE OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RAPOPORT IS APROVED AND ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED T HAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT A HEARING. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS NOT MET STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE HIS CASE HEARD, AND NO REASONABLE JURIST COULD FIND THIS PROCEDURAL RULING DEBATABLE, AND BECAUSE PETITIONER FAILS TO DEMONSTRATE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 11/29/2010. 11/29/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBINSON v. TENNIS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: DONNELL ROBINSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?