HAYMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District HAYMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

HAYMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Plaintiff:	FELTON HAYMAN
Respondent:	COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number:	2:2008cv00574
Filed:	February 5, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	JOHN P. FULLAM
Presiding Judge:	TIMOTHY R. RICE
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 5, 2012	Filing 31 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 1/5/12. 1/5/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
February 9, 2009	Filing 19 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED IN PART AS TO HAYMAN'S CONVICTION UNDER THE PA. C.O.A. WITH EXECUTION STAYED FOR 180 DAYS TO PERMIT THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA TO V ACATE THE CONVICTION AND RE-SENTENCE HAYMAN; AND DENIED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AS TO HIS UNTIMELY CLAIMS. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIRIFCATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN P. FULLAM ON 2/9/09. 2/9/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(lvj, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 5, 2012

Filing 31 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 1/5/12. 1/5/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

February 9, 2009

Filing 19 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED IN PART AS TO HAYMAN'S CONVICTION UNDER THE PA. C.O.A. WITH EXECUTION STAYED FOR 180 DAYS TO PERMIT THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA TO V ACATE THE CONVICTION AND RE-SENTENCE HAYMAN; AND DENIED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AS TO HIS UNTIMELY CLAIMS. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIRIFCATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN P. FULLAM ON 2/9/09. 2/9/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(lvj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAYMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: FELTON HAYMAN
Represented By:	ROBERT B. MOZENTER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?