WYATT v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
| KEVIN WYATT |
| DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2008cv00614 |
| February 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Montgomery |
| WILLIAM H. YOHN |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DISMISSED. THE PETITIONER HAVING FAILED TO MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, THERE IS NO GROUND TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 3/4/10. 3/5/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER THAT THIS CASE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE CIVIL SUSPENSE DOCKET PENDING THE PA SUPREME COURT'S CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONER'S SENTENCING CALCULATION CLAIM; THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES; AND WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE PA SUPREME COURT'S REVIEW OF WYATT'S SENTENCING CREDIT CLAIM, WYATT AND THE RESPONDENTS SHALL NOTIFY THIS COURT THAT THOSE PROCEEDINGS ARE CONCLUDED AND THE CASE IS READY TO PROCEED IN THIS COURT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 5/28/09. 5/29/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(lvj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
