MOORE v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
| JANELL T. MOORE |
| COMCAST CORPORATION, BRIAN L. ROBERTS, RALPH J. ROBERTS, S. DECKER ANSTROM, KENNETH J. BACON, SHELDON M. BONOVITZ, EDWARD D. BREEN, JULIAN A. BRODSKY, JOSEPH J. COLLINS, MICHAEL COOK, JEFFREY A. HONICKMAN, JUDITH RODIN, MICHAEL I. SOVERN, LAWRENCE J. SALVA and UNKNOWN FIDUCIARY DEFENDANTS 1-30 |
| 2:2008cv00773 |
| February 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS FOR APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS GRANTED; THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,650,000 AND FOR A COMPENSATORY AWARD TO HANELL T. MOORE IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000 IS GRANTED; AND THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS FOR AN AWARD OF LITIGATION COSTS IN GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE PLAINTIFFS ARE AWARDED $148,312.65 IN LITIGATION COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 1/24/2011. 1/25/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION OF PLAINTIFF FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 4/6/10. 4/7/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
